DISQUS

The Colorado Independent: What Happened Under Doug Bruce’s Golden Dome Yesterday?

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    I really, really wish that Dougie.... ....would just go back to California.  :sigh:


    Sincerely, Dougie, thanks for Tabor. 


    Now go away.

  • Wildflower · 1 year ago
    Staying tuned. to the latest episode ..

    And I can hardly wait for the next episode of "Dougie Goes to Denver"..


    I wonder how he's going to vote on the slumlord bill?
  • Awen · 1 year ago
    n/t He should take a 21(C).....
  • Notachanceatall · 1 year ago
    Yet another reason for me to vote for Mark Waller I do believe Mr. Bruce will be turned out of office in the next election cycle.


    A person can only take so much for so long and I, for one, have seen and heard enough from Mr. Bruce.


    He was much more fun to watch when he was getting under Sallie Clark's skin. 

  • Ryan · 1 year ago
    Douglas Bruce: Colorado media's Britney Spears The mainstream media in Denver, Colo Spgs, Grand Jct, and elsewhere in Colorado has no interest in the real news and progress happening every day in the Colorado State Legislature.  Television stations, radio, and newspaper has virtually no coverage of the ongoing legislative processes and successes.  One has to go to a site like coloradocapitoljournal.blogspot.com/ to get the kind of coverage merited for citizens to understand and be

    in the know. Douglas Bruce is Colorado's very own Britney Spears and the media everywhere from the monolithic Denver Post to the hapless television news like KUSA to the radio blather makers like Mike Rosen and Jon Caldera are doing everything they can to make him the center of attention at any and all costs.
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    So it's all a plot? To what end?
  • bmenezes · 1 year ago
    Not a plot And Ryan didn't appear to claim that it was one. He's making the same case that anyone else with common sense would make: The media are doing a poor job informing the public about issues of the greatest importance to the public. Nothing new, but a trend that takes on greater significance every time coverage of an asinine public act takes precedence over the conduct and execution of actual public policy.
  • Wildflower · 1 year ago
    re trivial news diversions Very astute analysis.  The "news" is all a diversion, it started with the advent of the ill-advised Iraq war I believe, that's why there is little information on the war, it's buried on the back pages if it's there at all.  War info re the tally of dead and wounded soldiers, etc. used to be online but now even that is gone.  It is assumed that we are so enrapt with Brittany etal that we will be too stupid to notice.

    So different than the Vietnam War, where it made the front page when one of our own was killed.  People were aware of the consequences and realized it was going nowhere and rebelled.


    Yes, "news" today is a diversion.
  • Wildflower · 1 year ago
    Diversion But I for one enjoy a good Dougie diversion in a vast sea of Brittany.
  • Richard Valenty · 1 year ago
    Do as we say, not as we do Hi Cara, it's about 12:30 Wednesday and I'm just hoping that you and your readers will notice one thing. This post chided "the media" for focusing on Mr. Bruce at the expense of hard news, and what's at the top of the page on Colorado Confidential?
      Yep, a picture of Douglas Bruce and a story mostly about him! Sure, there are a few other Legislative items bullet-pointed, but no substantial explanation on any of them.

      The more I read Colorado Confidential, the more I wish you would drop media criticism from your agenda and use that energy towards simply being media, which you do fairly well at times. Leslie's recent story on Club 20 and the I-70 piece yesterday were both pretty strong in my opinion, for example.

      So, here's a challenge. Go back through the Post and the Rocky's coverage on the Legislature since, say, the start of the 2008 session. Count the stories they've published on legislative affairs, and how many of them have primarily been about Douglas Bruce. Perhaps you could do the same thing with Colorado Confidential.

      I don't have time to do this (you probably don't either), and I'm sure the Bruce count would be out of proportion to what really goes on under the dome, but I'd love to see you quantify what the media is really doing as opposed to what you just did here.

      As for me, I'm working right now on a piece about a proposal to merge the state departments of Higher Education and (P-12) Education, and I probably won't be quoting Douglas Bruce. Cheers, Richard Valenty from the Colorado Daily newspaper

     
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    With all due respect, I think that there.... ....was a pretty strong allusion that the media were all doing the same thing, and for the same bad reason, hence the question about "plot."  I don't think I'm off base of what he was suggesting.
  • Cara DeGette · 1 year ago
    Thanks Richard We've got a great story about controversial injections to kill off mountain pine bark beetles up at the top of the page now. Thank goodness.
  • Richard Valenty · 1 year ago
    Pine beetles are better, but... Thank goodness, indeed! I spent 90 seconds on your archives and found 24 stories about Douglas Bruce without trying very hard.
  • Cara DeGette · 1 year ago
    Column inches Richard,


    Yes, we have broken many stories about Rep. Bruce, stories that I am proud we have been the first to report.


    In no way do I suggest that the media should completely ignore him. He is a public official. Perhaps the story posted above was a bit nuanced, and I encourage you to read it again. Hopefully you will better understand the point that I was trying to make -- that his disruptiveness hinders coverage of issues of substance. And, that some people long ago predicted exactly this scenario should he ever wind up in the Legislature. 

  • Wendy Norris · 1 year ago
    for comparison's sake I searched Google News from the date range July 11, 2006 (our launch date) through today:


    There were 370 stories written about Mr. Bruce in the traditional press.


    Just sayin'.

  • Wldflower · 1 year ago
    Dougie at the Dome Actually, it probably works the other way, When I see a Bruce story, I am interested and I read the article and  take in the other info re protecting tenants from landlords

    consumer rights, health issues...


    Without Dougie's lead-in I might think ho hum, legislators,  and not read the story.  So his name helps get people interested in the legislative process of government.


    This is unlike the Britany stories, where there is no additional info about anything but Britany.


  • Richard Valenty · 1 year ago
    Nuanced? Thanks Cara, I re-read the story as suggested, but I'd really like to see how you could claim with a straight face that the following quotes were shots at Bruce and not at the media:
      "And, the media just can't resist his nasty quips and jabs"; "that mob of TV and print reporters who proceeded to chase him around the building," "whether TV heads and the Capitol press corps will play along" with ignoring Bruce; or that the state officials would surely "far prefer the media to focus on issues of substance."

      Each quoted statement, as you will notice, is made up of "media" or "TV/print" followed by an action by the media.  And oddly enough, your story included no mention of online news sources or bloggers writing plenty of stuff about Bruce's comments or actions -- apparently it was only the news sources that send their digital data to printing presses as well as to the Internet?

      So, feel free to suggest after I called you out that I missed your nuanced "point," but I still think your post was full enough of unfair slams on the media to warrant comment. Also, I remain quite certain that at least the print media has covered plenty of issues of substance this session that weren't Bruce-dominated, even though I might agree with some of the posters on this thread who want more or better non-Bruce hard news from the mainstream.

      And Wendy, surely you noticed that part of my challenge to Confidential was to get you to also quantify how many stories had been written about non-Bruce issues to establish some sort of ratio? Sure, there have been hundreds of mainstream Bruce stories, but from how many sources? How many basic duplications?