<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Colorado Independent - Latest Comments in Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/updated_ballot_issue_scorecard/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:05:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669187</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thank you&lt;/strong&gt; There is a story in theRMN of both organizations turning in over 100,000 signatures.  And you may have been right, since the Pro DP turned in their signatures after the Anti DP group.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Go Blue</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:05:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669186</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;More info&lt;/strong&gt; Just to clarify the oil and gas intiatives...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;The "surface rights" initiative that would have made the energy companies pay full compensation for impacts on surface owners did not garner enough signatures;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;and the increase of severance taxes derived from oil and gas, coal, etc which would have been allocated to education also failed to get on the ballot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leslie Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:16:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669185</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Revised accordingly based on newest information.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Oh-Willeke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669184</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Your signature source sounds credible.  We'll find out soon.&lt;/strong&gt; The reasoning for holding if the anti-DP measure doesn't make it is that:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1) There is already a DP referendum on the ballot, and&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2) The anti-gay marriage ban isn't anti-DP.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, why clutter the ballot, when it won't accomplish much?  The purpose of the pro-DP amendment is simply to counteract the anti-DP amendment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Oh-Willeke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:56:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fairness &amp;amp; Equality&lt;/strong&gt; Someone inside the campaign told me over the weekend that had over 100,000.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be ridiculous to conclude that they would withhold their measure unless the anti-DP made the ballot, especially with the amount of money that has been dumped into the Fairness &amp;amp; Equality campaign as of late. The Stryker family has contributed hundreds of thousands.  They do not hand out money like hot cakes.  They do their research before investing in a political cause.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Go Blue</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Because the most recent data I have available&lt;/strong&gt; is that they (1) had considerably fewer than 100,000 signatures, and (2) were not planning on putting their measure on the ballot unless the anti-DP measure makes the ballot.  If you have access to better information that's great.  What is your source?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Oh-Willeke</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Updated Ballot Issue Scorecard</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/321/updated-ballot-issue-scorecard/#comment-1669181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;?&lt;/strong&gt; Why would you put pro-domestic partnership in the to close to call catergory when they are reporting over 100,000 petition signatures?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Go Blue</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:29:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>