-
Website
http://coloradoindependent.com -
Original page
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/4428/colorado-pro-labor-groups-to-submit-ballot-petitions/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ErinRosa
21 comments · 1 points
-
Wendy Norris
181 comments · 5 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 4 points
-
prsmith
39 comments · 8 points
-
markw4786
34 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
1 day ago · 10 comments
-
Report of ‘secret’ immigration detention centers raises rights concerns
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Stimulus funds aimed at rural areas dumped into metro regions
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
The pro-government anti-capitalist anti-American worldwide science hoax
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
Oh come on girls lets have someone post the ballot language of this corp fraud initiative so we can all review its merits.
YES on 47 AFFIRMS YOU CAN
"The group is also planning to turn in signatures on Thursday for another initiative that would require employers to provide just cause for firing certain employees."
That sounds pretty much like Just Cause to me....
"Amendment 47, a proposal that has been approved for the ballot and would make it illegal for labor unions to negotiate agreements to collect dues or agency fees from nonmember employees who receive union-negotiated benefits in the workplace."
I guess I just don't understand. Either the governor screwed the unions ("bind and effectively dismantling them") or he didn't which is it?
thewire and thewire 2 posts 2 minutes apart, 1 post answering the other as if anther person.
Erin aren't you concerned about this posting?
Proponents of Prop 47, the work for less amendment, should be more worried about their right not to be fired willy-nilly than whether they have to pay a few bucks to the union for representing them. But alas, they do not, since they are more worried about fattening the wallets of business owners and corporations than truly protecting the well-being of hard-working families.
Oh, and the grunt posts on RMN and the Post as jack a, and copies and pastes the same comments there as he does here, unless he/she is going on some weird rant regarding who Erin has in bed with her when she is writing her entries.
Grunt (Jack) sure sounds like a paid shill for an out of state front group.
"Union busting is a field populated by bullies and built on deceit. A campaign against a Union is an assault on individuals and a war on the truth. As such, it is a war without honor. The only way to bust a Union is to lie, distort, manipulate, threaten, and always, always attack. The enemy was the collective spirit. I got hold of that spirit while it was still a seedling; I poisoned it, choked it, bludgeoned it if I had to, anything to be sure it would never blossom into a united workforce...."
State policy is that no worker will lose their job if they choose to NOT join the union, pay union dues or pay agency fees. I always say, should all Coloradans have equal rights to real employee free choice.
So, if I follow your logic tallport, etc ... Governor Ritter is a Union busting hack. What is it tport ... hack or brother?
"They have security clauses, but that is a separate issue." School me here Tim how is Governor Ritter's Right-to-Work policy -- no state worker will be forced to pay even an agency fee as a condition of employment -- any different then Amendment 47?
I say YES on 47.
And yes, thanks, I am doing my best with the inmates and I can do my job much better with a contract and job security.
"The Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization or PATCO was a labor union that once represented air traffic controllers in the United States in matters relating to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment."