<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Colorado Independent - Latest Comments in Suthers Approved Controversial Election Rule</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/suthers_approved_controversial_election_rule/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 05:31:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Suthers Approved Controversial Election Rule</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/627/suthers-approved-controversial-election-rule/#comment-1669648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What a way to rig an election&lt;/strong&gt; How come with write-in candidates, their names had to be spelled correctly to count, but now the Secretary of State says you can vote for one person and it can apply for a replacement candidate. Can we use that rule for marriage licenses, too?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leslie Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 05:31:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>