<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Colorado Independent - Latest Comments in Pot Trial Ends In Settlement</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/pot_trial_ends_in_settlement/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:02:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pot Trial Ends In Settlement</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/4229/pot-trial-ends-in-settlement/#comment-1678498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To give you a quick answer: probably. Although I don't know if such a case would go all the way to the supreme court.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erinrosa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pot Trial Ends In Settlement</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/4229/pot-trial-ends-in-settlement/#comment-1678499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What is the law? If police officers are still arresting people for possession, and the defendants are still being handcuffed, booked and charged with a criminal offense, possession remains illegal, doesn't it? Is the police force using the paraphernalia charge to sidestep the inevitable city vs state trial?&lt;br&gt;I know it's not the responsibility of the defendant to test the limits of a new policy, but is someone going to have to take a possession case all the way to the state supreme court before we know if possession is legal in Denver?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rdbriceland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:00:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>