-
Website
http://coloradoindependent.com -
Original page
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/8198/palin-rehashes-nom-speech-lashes-out-at-wall-street/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ErinRosa
21 comments · 1 points
-
Wendy Norris
181 comments · 5 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 4 points
-
prsmith
39 comments · 8 points
-
markw4786
34 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
1 day ago · 10 comments
-
Report of ‘secret’ immigration detention centers raises rights concerns
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Stimulus funds aimed at rural areas dumped into metro regions
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
The pro-government anti-capitalist anti-American worldwide science hoax
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
the only reform sarah could bring to the table is her record and that shows she can only spin facts. we have already 8 years of that and rove politics.
energy? palin doesn't even know how much energy the state of alaska provides.
special needs? would all who need help also have a state employee (i.e.ivy frye) take care of their children like palin does?
has mccain decided what todd (shadow governor) will do?
God help us all. if mccain/palin aren't more of the same then i've been living somewhere else for the past 7+ years.
senator obama most definitely re-hashed the bulk of his nomination acceptance speech from a few weeks ago. he definitely relied heavily on his teleprompter for the very few fresh sections of it. in his pre-speech 'thank yous' he mispronounced the word Ute as "ootay."
he departed before the cheers died down and he did not take any questions.
for what it's worth ...
there isn't a day that goes by -- and today, mr. obama's comments on economic policy that he made in golden offer a perfect example - when claims by national politicians aren't refuted. why wasn't this 'simple reporting' provided on your site?
don't get me wrong. at this point in the campaign, i've every intention of voting for senator obama. and i think, by and large, this story on palin and her speech was informative. but by picking on her re-use of old rhetoric, etc., while insinuating that obama once again nailed it in front of throngs of followers, i think it's injecting bias into a story that ultimately weakens the work that was put into it.
i went to junction anticipating being thoroughly impressed. i was not. obama was flat. he used dozens of the same quote lines he's already used, verbatim. i actually found it hard to pay close attention because his speech was, frankly, boring. but that's OK. no one hits a home run every time up. if anything, all this made obama seem more real to me. and i think i found a new respect for him and the unbelievably daunting task he faces every day in this campaign in which he is attempting to make history.
making him out to seem infallible hurts this cause, in my view.