DISQUS

The Colorado Independent: Onetime Rising GOP Star Back To Prison For Sex Assaults

  • makesmesick · 1 year ago
    wow Perhaps Mr. Ankeeny's brother is forgetting the VICTIM is 14 YEARS OLD!!!!!  he should worry how this looks in print:


    "I worry how this might look in print, but everything he's been accused of, well, there have always been way more facts to the story than what gets out," Geoffrey Ankeney said. "He's made some bad choices, but he's not the only guilty party."


    Concurrent sentences too.  Nice legal system we have.  Parole potential in 3 years. Sweet deal for a three time sex offender (all in the span of 5 years).

  • rocco7 · 1 year ago
    How will it be played? Oh, man! concurrently served sentences. Will Bill O'Reilly go nuts on the "lax sentencing" of this child predator? Will he do a story on how Colorado doesn't "drop the hammer" on these offenders? All those counts, underage victims, obvious inability to control himself. This is perfect factor fodder. Oh Oh! Hold the phone........Randall's a republican? Never mind.
  • Oppose them · 1 year ago
    Face of the Republican Party What is it about the Republican Party that attracts people like Ankeney, Mark Foley, falaful Bill OReilly, drug addict Rush Limbaugh, Larry Craig, Ted Haggard and Brian Doyle?
  • Zappatero · 1 year ago
    where's "Truth"-teller when you need him? ha ha ha!
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    He's not being an butthead and trying to do the "guilt by association" crap that democrats like Zappaterro always attempt.
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Nice display of blind hatred.  Like there are no registered democrats who are child abusers and molesters.  Yeah, right.  Sure.
  • ANKENEYWATCHER · 1 year ago
    THIS IS NOT POLITICAL!!! WHY DOESN'T EVERYONE FOCUS ON THE ISSUE AT HAND WHICH IS AN ADULT WHO HABITUALLY SEXUALLY ASSAULTS CHILDREN.  HIS POLITICAL AFFILIATION IS IRRELEVANT.
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Why don't they focus on the issue? Because that wouldn't give them the opportunity to bash and disparage their Republican political enemies, that's why.  Why do you think that this story was given front page, top banner treatment in the first place?  To bash Republicans, obviously.
  • ederlore · 1 year ago
    Truthteller? More like Blind Stupidity! Well, if anyone had a question as to why you'll find more sex offenders in the Republican party than the Democratic party, I think "truthtellers" comments will reveal why.  They circle the wagons and try to change the subject or throw it back to the old red herring of "the Democrats do it too" or "it's blind hatred" or "it's Republican bashing'.  Well, "Truthteller" (boy is that a misnomer) go find all those Democrats who have been found guilty of molesting underage girls and boys.  I think the ratio is about 25 Republicans to 1 Democrat.  The difference with our party is we don't defend sex molesters. We don't care if they have a big D after their name.  A criminal is a criminal and they should be punished for their crimes!  Trust me, I'd be just as angry about this jerk no matter what party he belonged to although I'm sure your remarks would be much different if he were something other than a Republican. 
  • ANKENEYWATCHER · 1 year ago
    STILL NOT POLITICAL! WAY TO FOCUS!
  • count 'em all · 1 year ago
    StoryTeller must be feeling that guilt by association.
  • DeSwiss · 1 year ago
    Name them.... .... if you can. I have no doubt you'll find a few. Repukes on the other hand have presented us an almost endless supply of slime and corruption.


    http://www.gopscanda...


    http://www.illuminat...


    http://hammernews2.c...


    http://www.liberalsl...


    http://www.armchairs...

  • DeSwiss · 1 year ago
    Precisely.... ...and very well putt.


    Repuke Pedophile & Scandal Links (ad nauseum):


    http://www.gopscanda...


    http://www.illuminat...


    http://hammernews2.c...


    http://www.liberalsl...


    http://www.armchairs...

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    More Republican bashing. :Yawn:


    And no Republican is defending Ankeney.  Not one.  So why did you tell the lie that democrats don't defend sex offenders when Republicans do?  Not to mention that "25 Republicans to 1 democrat" lie.  Wouldn't care to try to give a source for that "statistic," now would you?


    Wake up and smell what you're shoveling. All you're doing is demonstrating, once again, your blind hatred for Republicans.  Spare us.

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Name them, if I can? The last year the Democrats were in control of the House of Representatives in 1994, Rep. Mel Reynolds (D-IL) was indicted for sexually assaulting a 16-year-old campaign volunteer in August 1994. Instead of demanding his resignation, Democrats rallied to his defense and played the race card and the "nuts and sluts" defense ala Bill Clinton. "Deny, deny, deny. Attack, attack attack." That's the Democratic mantra when one of their own is accused of wrongdoing.


    Reynolds was inexplicably re-elected by the voters of his district. The following August he was convicted on 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography. He waited another three months after his conviction before he resigned. While he was in prison, he was convicted on other crimes for bank fraud. And for being such a nice guy, President Bill Clinton rewarded him on his way out of office by commuting his sentence to time-served. Reynolds was a free man.


    So not only do democrats have sex offenders, they PRAISE them.  They REELECT them.  They FREE THEM TO PREY UPON MORE VICTIMS.


    Gee, is that the kind of naming you wanted?

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Who treats sex offenders with kid gloves? While he represented inner-city Chicago, Reynolds was a good friend of the Nation of Islam's Louis Farrakhan. They were such close friends that Reynolds had no problem spouting some of Farrakhan's various anti-Semitic incantations against Jews while in office.


    But all of this vicious hate couldn't help Reynolds when he helped himself to regular illegal sexual relations with a 16-year-old "campaign worker," Beverly T. Heard. A tape of an explicit June 6, 1994, phone conversation between Heard and Reynolds was exhibit number TR-1 in People v. Melvin Reynolds, a trial that ended in Reynolds' conviction. Reynolds was sentenced to several years in federal prison for this and fraud and corruption convictions; his wife and three children went on welfare in Boston.


    A sampling of Reynolds' phone conversation rivals the lurid detail of Clinton's lewd behavior in the Starr Report. Various underwear choices and sex acts are graphically described by Reynolds to his youthful female target. This includes a planned threesome with a 15-year-old Catholic schoolgirl named Theresa. Awestruck with the prospect, Reynolds rhetorically asks, "Did I win the Lotto?" It's enough to make Reynolds' pardoner, Monica's boyfriend, blush.


    And not only was Reynolds pardoned by Clinton, but he was hired by Rev. Jesse Jackson's Operation PUSH to decrease the number of young blacks going to prison. Given its new employee -- teen "romance" king Reynolds -- it's ironic that Jackson founded PUSH to persuade minority students to avoid, among other things, teen-age pregnancy. Until Clinton's pardon, Reynolds, like any other convicted child molester, was required to register as a sex offender in each place he lived.


    Contrast Jackson's and Clinton's nonchalant and -- worse -- forgiving attitude toward this convicted child rapist and sex offender to the behavior on the other side of the aisle toward his Republican counterpart. In 1989, conservative Republican Congressman Donald "Buz" Lukens of Ohio was caught on tape discussing his sexual relationship with an underage teen-ager. The sting, set-up by FOX's now defunct "A Current Affair," at a Columbus, Ohio, McDonald's, ended with Lukens' 1990 conviction for under-age sex, jail time, a mandatory AIDS test and sex-offender counseling.


    But, even before charges were filed against Lukens by authorities, then-House Republican Whip Newt Gingrich, called for Lukens to resign and filed ethics charges against Lukens with the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. Even Republicans, like Rep. John Kasich -- who cut his political teeth as an aide to Lukens when he was an Ohio state senator -- called for Lukens' removal. House Republicans even funded and campaigned for a successful Republican primary opponent against Lukens, Rep. John Boehner. In Reynolds' case, just like Clinton's, House Democrats did nothing, insisting that this was a matter for the courts to decide.


    Lukens resigned from the House in disgrace, served his jail time, got prostate cancer and is now broke. But, at the end of his presidency in 1992, President George Bush didn't even think of pardoning Lukens, nor did any conservative organization hire him in any capacity, unlike Jackson and PUSH have done for Reynolds.


    But that's the difference between Democrats and Republicans, between conservatives and liberals. Sex offenders are persona non grata in the party of Lincoln. For Democrats, it's just imitation -- the sincerest form of flattery -- for the just-retired commander in chief. And just like Clinton, Reynolds never showed any form of remorse for what he did, whether it was to the girl he molested, or to Laurance Capriotti, whom Reynolds cheated, among others, out of $25,000 to earn his 1997 fraud and corruption convictions.

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    And which president signed anti-child molester legislation? Not Clinton..... Bush Signs Bill to Keep Tabs on Convicted Child Molesters


    Thursday , July 27, 2006


    WASHINGTON -


    President Bush, joined by "America's Most Wanted" host John Walsh, signed a new law Thursday that requires convicted child molesters to be listed on a national Internet database and face a felony charge for failing to update their whereabouts.

    "Our nation grieves with every family that's suffered the unbearable pain of a child whose been abducted or abused," Bush said in a bill-signing ceremony in the Rose Garden. "This law takes an important step forward in this country's efforts to protect those who cannot protect themselves."


    The measure was named for Walsh's 6-year-old son, Adam, who was abducted exactly 25 years ago Thursday, and subsequently murdered.


    It aims to help police find more than 100,000 sex offenders by creating the first national online listing available to the public and searchable by ZIP code. It also called for harsh federal punishment for sexually assaulting children, including the possibility of the death penalty when a victim is murdered.


    "Today is truly a family day for us," Walsh's wife, Reve, told reporters outside the West Wing following the event. "Adam's presence is felt here with us today. This is all about children. It tells children in our country that they are precious and are cared about - even though they don't have any money, or vote or lobby - that we will take care of them."


    Bush said the new law will help prevent child abuse by creating the national child abuse registry, and requiring investigators to do background checks on adoptive and foster parents before they are approved to take custody of a child. Giving child protective services professionals in all 50 states access to this information will improve their ability to investigate their child abuse cases, he said.


    "These improvements will help prevent sex offenders from evading detection by moving from one state to the next," Bush said.


    Child advocates have called the bill the most sweeping sex offender legislation to target pedophiles in years. It would:


    -Establish a comprehensive federal DNA database of material collected from convicted molesters, and procedures for the routine DNA collection and comparison to the database when someone has been convicted of such an offense.


    -Provide federal funding for states to track pedophiles using global positioning devices.


    -Allow victims of child abuse to sue their molesters.


    The law imposes a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years for raping a child; a mandatory 10-year penalty for sex trafficking offenses involving children and for coercing child prostitution; and increases minimum sentences for molesters who travel between states.

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Gosh, maybe I should put up some more democrat sex offenders?

    REP. JOHN YOUNG (D-Tex.):


    On June 11, 1976, Colleen Gardner, a former staff secretary to Young, told the New York Times that Young increased her salary after she gave in to his sexual advances. In November, Young, who had run unopposed in the safe Democratic district five consecutive times, was reelected with just 61 percent of the vote. The scandal wouldn't go away, and in 1978 Young was defeated in a Democratic primary runoff.


    REP. ALLAN HOWE (D-Utah):




    On June 13, 1976, Howe was arrested in Salt Lake City on charges of soliciting two policewomen posing as prostitutes. Howe insisted he was set up and refused to resign. But the Democratic Party distanced itself from his candidacy and he was trounced by his Republican opponent in the November election.


    REP. FRED RICHMOND (D-N.Y.):




    In April 1978, Richmond was arrested in Washington for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old boy. Richmond apologized for his actions, conceding he "made bad judgments involving my private life." In spite of a Democratic primary opponent's attempts to cash in on the headlines, Richmond easily won renomination and reelection. But his career came to an end four years later when, after pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and tax evasion - and amid allegations that he had his staff procure cocaine for him -- he resigned his seat.


    REP. JOHN HINSON (D-Miss.):




    On Aug. 8, 1980, during his first reelection bid, Hinson stunned everyone by announcing that in 1976 he had been accused of committing an obscene act at a gay haunt in Virginia. Hinson, married and a strong conservative, added that in 1977 he had survived a fire in a gay D.C. movie theater. He was making the disclosure, he said, because he needed to clear his conscience. But he denied he was a homosexual and refused GOP demands that he resign. Hinson won reelection in a three-way race, with 39 percent of the vote. But three months later, he was arrested on charges of attempted oral sodomy in the restroom of a House office building. He resigned his seat on April 13, 1981.


    REP. ROBERT BAUMAN (D-Md.):




    On Oct. 3, 1980, Bauman, a leading "pro-family" conservative, pleaded innocent to a charge that he committed oral sodomy on a teenage boy in Washington. Married and the father of four, Bauman conceded that he had been an alcoholic but had been seeking treatment. The news came as a shock to voters of the rural, conservative district, and he lost to a Democrat in November.


    REP. DAN CRANE (R-Ill.) and REP. GERRY STUDDS (D-Mass.):




    The House ethics committee on July 14, 1983, announced that Crane and Studds had sexual relationships with teenage congressional pages -- Crane with a 17-year-old female in 1980, Studds with a 17-year-old male in 1973. Both admitted the charges that same day, and Studds acknowledged he was gay. The committee voted to reprimand the two, but a back-bench Georgia Republican named Newt Gingrich argued that they should be expelled. The full House voted on July 20 instead to censure the two, the first time that ever happened for sexual misconduct. Crane, married and the father of six, was tearful in his apology to the House, while Studds refused to apologize. Crane's conservative district voted him out in 1984, while the voters in Studds's more liberal district were more forgiving. Studds won reelection in 1984 with 56 percent of the vote, and continued to win until he retired in 1996.


    REP. ERNIE KONNYU (D-Calif.):




    In August 1987, two former Konnyu aides complained to the San Jose Mercury News that the freshman Republican had sexually harassed them. GOP leaders were unhappy with Konnyu's temperament to begin with, so it took little effort to find candidates who would take him on in the primary. Stanford professor Tom Campbell ousted Konnyu the following June.


    SEN. BROCK ADAMS (D-Wash.):




    On Sept. 27, 1988, Seattle newspapers reported that Kari Tupper, the daughter of Adams's longtime friends, filed a complaint against the Washington Democrat in July of 1987, charging sexual assault. She claimed she went to Adams's house in March 1987 to get him to end a pattern of harassment, but that he drugged her and assaulted her. Adams denied any sexual assault, saying they only talked about her employment opportunities. Adams continued raising campaign funds and declared for a second term in February of 1992. But two weeks later the Seattle Times reported that eight other women were accusing Adams of sexual molestation over the past 20 years, describing a history of drugging and subsequent rape. Later that day, while still proclaiming his innocence, Adams ended his campaign.


    REP. JIM BATES (D-Calif.):




    Roll Call quoted former Bates aides in October 1988 saying that the San Diego Democrat made sexual advances toward female staffers. Bates called it a GOP-inspired smear campaign, but also apologized for anything he did that might have seemed inappropriate. The story came too close to Election Day to damage Bates, who won easily. However, the following October the ethics committee sent Bates a "letter of reproval" directing him to make a formal apology to the women who filed the complaint. Although the district was not thought to be hospitable to the GOP, Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a former Navy pilot who was once shot down over North Vietnam, ousted Bates in 1990 by fewer than 2,000 votes.


    REP. GUS SAVAGE (D-Ill.):




    The Washington Post reported on July 19, 1989, that Savage had fondled a Peace Corps volunteer while on an official visit to Zaire. Savage called the story a lie and blamed it on his political enemies and a racist media. (Savage is black.) In January 1990, the House ethics committee decided that the events did occur, but decided against any disciplinary action because Savage wrote a letter to the woman saying he "never intended to offend" her. Savage was reelected in 1990, but finally ousted in the 1992 primary by Mel Reynolds.


    REP. BARNEY FRANK (D-Mass.):




    In response to a story in the Aug. 25, 1989, Washington Times, Frank confirmed that he hired Steve Gobie, a male prostitute, in 1985 to live with and work for him in his D.C. apartment. But Frank, who is gay, said he fired Gobie in 1987 when he learned he was using the apartment to run a prostitution service. The Boston Globe, among others, called on Frank to resign, but he refused. On July 19, 1990, the ethics committee recommended Frank be reprimanded because he "reflected discredit upon the House" by using his congressional office to fix 33 of Gobie's parking tickets. Attempts to expel or censure Frank failed; instead the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him. The fury in Washington was not shared in Frank's district, where he won reelection in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.


    SEN. DANIEL INOUYE (D-Hawaii):




    In October 1992, Republican Senate nominee Rick Reed began running a campaign commercial that included a surreptitiously taped interview with Lenore Kwock, Inouye's hairdresser. Kwock said Inouye had sexually forced himself on her in 1975 and continued a pattern of sexual harassment, even as Kwock continued to cut his hair over the years. Inouye, seeking a sixth term, denied the charges. And Kwock said that by running the commercial, Reed had caused her more pain than Inouye had. Reed was forced to pull the ad, and while many voters took out their anger on the Republican, Inouye was held to 57 percent of the vote - the lowest total of his career. A week later, a female Democratic state legislator announced that she had heard from nine other women who claimed Inouye had sexually harassed them over the past decade. But the women didn't go public with their claims, the local press didn't pursue the story, and the Senate Ethics Committee decided to drop the investigation because the accusers wouldn't participate in an inquiry.


    REP MEL REYNOLDS (D-Ill.):




    Freshman Reynolds was indicted on Aug. 19, 1994, on charges of having sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker and then pressuring her to lie about it. Reynolds, who is black, denied the charges and said the investigation was racially motivated. The GOP belatedly put up a write-in candidate for November, but Reynolds dispatched him in the overwhelmingly Democratic district with little effort. Reynolds was convicted on Aug. 22, 1995 of 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography, was sentenced to five years in prison, and resigned his seat on October 1.


    So what was it you were saying again about how only the Republican Party has sex offenders and child molesters? 


  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    Hey, "ederlore," you were quick with the namecalling.... .....but not so quick to respond to actual FACTS being presented.  What's the problem?  Having a hard time admitting that you were flat wrong with your assertions?  Bummed out at your namecalling and bashing being exposed for what it was?
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    And how about you, "deswiss?" You were real fast to "putt" up that BS moveondotorg propaganda....but now pretty slow to respond to some actual FACTS.  Why is that, I wonder? 
  • Hmmmm? · 1 year ago
    Where is Zappy when you need him? I notice that since he personally attacked you, he's been too gutless to even try to answer your points here, either. 


    These Democrat hacks are quick on the attack, but when someone counters their namecalling, they run and hide. 

  • Cara DeGette · 1 year ago
    Um... Hey, everybody,


    Just a reminder: This story is about Randy Ankeney and his latest incarceration.


    Thanks for reading.

  • Zappatero · 1 year ago
    Jeez, I was just asking where he was, I didn't attack him.
  • Hmmm · 1 year ago
    Please don't insult our intelligence. You don't do it well enough to get away with it.  You tried attacking him, or taunting him, if you prefer.  He answered with facts and material that no one, including you, has been able to refute.  You owe him an apology - in fact, several of you do.
  • Hmmm · 1 year ago
    If it's only about Ankeney, then why did you bring up Republicans and the Republican Party at all?  Such material is hardly relevant to his current incarceration.
  • Wendy Norris · 1 year ago
    it's absolutely relevant Ankeney was being groomed for elected office.


    To the Colorado GOP's credit, they dropped him like a hot potato following the first arrest.


    When Ankeney is eventually released, potentially in 2011, it will still be relevant if he intends a contrite public conversion to resume his career in and around politics -- a strategy that has worked for a fair number of fallen public figures.

  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    WAS. Past tense In fact, several YEARS past tense now.  And since no Republican is defending him and no Republican wants to have anything to do with him, then why is it relevant to bring it up?  It's not.


    And you presume that he will somehow "resume his career in and around politics?"  And IF he does, THEN it would be relevant?  OH, please!  Like any sex offender in his situation could possibly do that.  With all due respect, Ms. Norris, give me a break. 

  • Sage · 1 year ago
    StoryTeller's Dilemma Ms. Norris is right.  We should keep the discussion on Republican Ankeney.  StoryTeller could keep bringing up people back to the Civil War.  Seemed to be relevant when StoryTeller did it.  Just because this story is CURRENT, it doesn't change what this guy has done or his deep connections to the Colorado Republican Party.
  • Truthteller · 1 year ago
    If I'm telling a "story" then why is it that neither namecallers like you or anyone else has been able to refute it with facts of your own?  Why is it that you stoop immediately to nothing more than the personal attack and feeble attempts at ridicule?


    The answer is obvious - you have nothing truly of substance to say.

  • Wendy Norris · 1 year ago
    please read the comment policy The ad hominem attacks on other readers and inappropriate off-topic comments are not consistent with Colorado Confidential's comment policy.


    Comments will be deleted and IP addresses will be banned if this behavior continues. 

  • DeSwiss · 1 year ago
    And? Nice list. A little short by comparison to the Repukes, but whatever.


    Look, I'm not saying the Dems don't have their share of cretins. What I am saying is that the Repukes have an inordinate supply of them. Almost seemingly every other one. And in particular, those Repukes (like Catholic priests) which are a peculiar variety of cretin. The ones who seem to seek out children as their victims.


    What consenting adults do behind closed doors, is neither my, nor your business. But anytime an elected official (of any political party) uses the power of office to gain access to children, or to coerce others into sex, then they should be barred from office and if the circumstances warrant it, locked up. No matter what their political affiliation. Like this chump:


    Lawmaker Garcia resigns after claims he exposed himself to lobbyist

    http://www.denverpos...


    Yeah, he's a Dem and he should have resigned.


    Now, be honest with yourself if you claim to stand for the TRUTH. Go back to those links I posted. There ain't no comparison buddy.


    Sorry, nice try....

  • Alexpolors · 1 year ago
    Will You Give me an advice? hi!
    i use the viagra pills at last time (about four monthes) but yesterday i read
    an article about cialis. and now i am going to order cilais at http://www.edtabsonline.com/ and test this tablet.
    Someone took this tablet before? Whats the effect?
    Thanx