<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Colorado Independent - Latest Comments in Nobel Makes Global Warming a Hot Policy Topic</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/nobel_makes_global_warming_a_hot_policy_topic/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:38:33 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nobel Makes Global Warming a Hot Policy Topic</title><link>http://www.coloradoindependent.com/3044/nobel-makes-global-warming-a-hot-policy-topic/#comment-1676089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lack Of Discourse&lt;/strong&gt; Ah, yes again another article that contributes no more to the public discourse on the issue than Rush Limbaugh has done.  Can we talk about the science?  Would that really be so hard?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;And for the record, most of Al Gore's claims are ridiculous.  Just a few weeks ago Holland was on Colorado Matters and gave a very, VERY diplomatic answer to a question about the validity of Al Gore's claims. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:38:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>