http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/enSat, 23 Oct 2010 07:00:27 -0000http://www.coloradoindependent.com/1619/kicking-and-honking/#comment-89384703<p>Veteran lobbyist William Imig with Allstate also spoke against the bill, while 7 others spoke in favor of it. </p>oil paintingSat, 23 Oct 2010 07:00:27 -0000http://www.coloradoindependent.com/1619/kicking-and-honking/#comment-1671667<p><strong>Article</strong> I think the RMN article I linked to does a great job of emphasizing the arguments for and against the bill. </p><p><br>But I wasn't writing about its merit, only the fact that three supporters happen to be connected to the legislation in this case. It's not like I'm saying anyone is on the take here.</p>Erin RosaFri, 23 Mar 2007 11:31:03 -0000http://www.coloradoindependent.com/1619/kicking-and-honking/#comment-1671666<p><strong>seroiusly</strong> How about maybe describing the arguments for and against? or is the point just to show how "powerful" a lobby can be with a mere $400? maybe the lobbyists had a better point than those in favor? Wouldn't know by reading this...</p>mcmitchellFri, 23 Mar 2007 10:54:26 -0000http://www.coloradoindependent.com/1619/kicking-and-honking/#comment-1671665<p><strong>And</strong> your point being?</p>blahFri, 23 Mar 2007 10:47:11 -0000