-
Website
http://coloradoindependent.com -
Original page
http://coloradoindependent.com/11968/denver-archbishop-takes-swipe-at-obama-biden-over-abortion-rights -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ErinRosa
21 comments · 1 points
-
Wendy Norris
181 comments · 5 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 4 points
-
prsmith
39 comments · 8 points
-
markw4786
34 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
1 day ago · 10 comments
-
Report of ‘secret’ immigration detention centers raises rights concerns
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Stimulus funds aimed at rural areas dumped into metro regions
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz
1 week ago · 6 comments
-
The pro-government anti-capitalist anti-American worldwide science hoax
2 days ago · 1 comment
-
John Andrews’ strange, clueless ‘Coloradan of the Year’ column
He was calling on behalf of Bob Schaffer in re support of Schaffer by Catholics, alluding to 5 tenets of Catholicism, (?) I think he mentioned homosexuality, abortion, stem cell, I don't know what the other two things they hate were, since I am not Catholic.
How very sad and divisive it is when religions interject themselves into politics.
Maybe the churches should pay taxes for awhile instead and they would change their minds about
forcing their religious beliefs on others.
• Pro-life ranters are not pro-life.
They are pro-BIRTH. A dogma once called pro-natalism. It’s an androcentric, completely misogynistic, demand that no impediment whatsoever on births be permitted by law. What happens to mother and child after birth is irrelevant since the “laws” of nature will then cull weak from strong.
No chemical contraception: the pill, spermacides. No barriers to conception: IUD, condoms. No abortions, not even in cases of rape, incest. Pro-natalism is the sexual theory of Ms. Palin, myriad other fundies, Mormons, and the RC church. Enough of ancient paternalistic desert tribal customs which do not belong in any planet-wide ethos.
• Issue one is quality of life, not frequency of birth.
As Marvin Harris made very clear in “Cannibals and Kings”: reproduction will always overtake food production, leading to vast overpopulation, de-facto slavery, degraded environments, and marginal living conditions. Technological intensification of food production makes for only short-term solutions.
But, technological innovation in birth control should already make ancient fears of Doomsday disappear. Why has insane population growth continued, especially in America the wasteful, which added 100 million people in 37 years.
In fact this sick religio-ideology is pro-mass-death: creating disease, poverty, and ignorance worldwide by fostering overpopulation, damning safe non-reproductive sex, and blocking responsible medical research.
• Issue two is social control directed against women and children
Religious authoritarians hate the US. They will not tolerate an open society, a pluralist culture, or a secular state.
Like their muslim brethren, authoritarian xians shudder at a technological world in which mental agility has replaced physical strength as a core measure of economic utility. This reordering of values strips away a core big-3 monotheist lie: god-ordained male supremacy.
Xian ultra-rights, just like Islamic ultra-rights, demand racial “purity,” male dominated social control, subjugation of women, unquestioned acceptance of religious tyranny.
bipolar2 © 2008
What a moral dilemma! If we believe in the 5th commandment, "Thou shall not
kill", we cannot vote in this election. Both candidates believe in murder.
Obama is pro choice and McCain voted for Bush’s war, one in which we were not attacked,
therefore, a mortal sin; where thousands of Americans soldiers have been martyred
by our diabolic administration for an unworthy cause and where over a hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis have been killed or displaced, mostly civilians.
But, rather than not vote, I suggest you disregard some American Bishops and vote
your conscience.
Otherwise, may we all "requiescant in pace".
Paul Kos
If people are really serious about decreasing the number of abortions, they will advocate for poor women and teenage girls to have access to family planning and birth control information and child-rearing information. And they will advocate to help children who are already born.
Be a real leader with a balanced view. Then, perhaps your "flock" will follow.
And Elmerg...he wasn't in his pulpit. And he still has freedom of speech, regardless. The constitution says so, and is held in higher regard than any tax code...you knucklehead!
A few bad priests and all of religion is under fire. You people are challenged. I feel bad for you.