DISQUS

Ugly Ernie · 2 years ago

Gender Counting You are absolutely correct that the court's decision was terse. Such a brief order is common when the court unanimously affirms the title board.

Because you noted that the title board is "all male," you might have also noted that the supreme court is not. It has 3 women and 4 men.
oldbogus · 2 years ago

The egg and I I can't believe they didn't include giving them the vote. Of course we couldn't let women vote for them so the father, if known, would get to cast the embryo's vote.
victorBob · 2 years ago

wrong The court did not "affirm" the challenge; it rejected the challenge.
your mom · 2 years ago

dead link "For more information, read Scrambling the 'Egg-as-Person' Ballot Measure."

That link is dead yo.
bmenezes · 2 years ago

Gotta be 18 to vote still... But the little blastocytes will provide a dandy child tax credit nine months earlier than before...
Wendy Norris · 2 years ago

sorry about that. link is fixed.
Zappatero · 2 years ago

Colorado for Equal Rights why do I not believe their name?