-
Website
http://coloradoindependent.com -
Original page
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/3086/breaking-udall-gets-a-primary-challenge-in-senate-race/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ErinRosa
21 comments · 1 points
-
Wendy Norris
181 comments · 5 points
-
DOUGLASFIELD
27 comments · 3 points
-
prsmith
39 comments · 8 points
-
markw4786
34 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz
7 hours ago · 3 comments
-
Report: Colorado home to secret immigration detention centers
12 hours ago · 2 comments
-
Anarchist Ariel Attack pleads guilty to Democratic Party Denver vandalism
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Reformers turn to election reform to clean up co-op energy
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Norton wins over Tea Partiers with call to eliminate Department of Education
1 week ago · 9 comments
-
Freshman Year, the gay marriage episode: Polis versus Chaffetz
a pro forma challenge and an actual primary contest,
even if it's not close,
gives both candidates the opportunity to get more press,
either through debates,
or through challenges and responses made through the media.
It's free publicity.
It serves the community.
And since the challenge sounds amicable,
it won't hurt the eventual winner.
.
I must admit even as a kid, I thought the watergate hearings were fascinating, and what better way to get people involved in the political process but to bring in some drama??
Shining a light on darkness is the best way to preserve our democracy. Otherwise, every administration will push farther and farther until we can't trust anybody.
And then the Senate didn't convict.
truthteller, funny.....
http://www.iseehawks...
But I didn't ask about the results of any investigation. I asked if she fully supported the conducting of those investigations, the purpose of which is to determine if the allegations made were correct or not. Isn't that the responsible thing to do, in order to keep the government as clean as possible? Or do you two only object to investigations when they're directed at members of one particular political party?
Dividing the party into categories based on relevant opinions on key issues is not helpful to the issues nor the party.
A run by a candidate who takes issue with the voting record of a fellow candidate is the most democratic of pursuits.
I believe one of the biggest problems with the democratic party is the excessive political stratagizing out of fear that overshadows the true issues. This creates dissatisfaction in people who believe in democratic party principles, but have lost faith in the representative politicians.
If it is "far left wing" to not live in fear, and to stand up for what you beleieve in, then I proudly fly with that flock. No democrat should react from fear, and although there are always considerations, doing right by issues and the people is by far more powerful than is being scared of the other party.
We have nothing to fear but fear itself. - JFK
"nothing to fear but fear itself" - FDR
I hit "post" too soon. Forgive me.
I wish there was a viable candidate to vote for besides Mark Udall. These issues may serve to make him weak with independants and swing voters in the coming election.
Unsatisfied.