<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Colorado Independent - Latest Comments in A handicapped cabinet: Running a presidential slate is a bad idea</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://coloradoindependent.disqus.com/a_handicapped_cabinet_running_a_presidential_slate_is_a_bad_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:51:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A handicapped cabinet: Running a presidential slate is a bad idea</title><link>http://coloradoindependent.com/12409/a-handicapped-cabinet-running-a-presidential-slate-is-a-bad-idea#comment-3246614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure you know, but the Brits also elect a party and not a person to P.M. Of course, the leader of the party than wins then becomes P.M.-- but the systems (U.S. v. U.K.)  are very different. Interesting comparison, I always enjoy your pov.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kate</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:51:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>